I have always felt that it should be called Non sensex, rather than sensex!
In my humble view, it is hundred percent gambling, profit-making and highly insensitive, jittery and short-sighted sentiment driven index. Nothing more. People try to fool you saying there is some science behind it and all that, but don't fall for it. It is pure nonsense.

Take the journey of the sensex during the last month or so. Opinion polls predict a hung parliament, sensex falls. Congress wins, sensex rises the next day. Economic survey predicts sweeping economic reforms, sensex zooms. Pranab presents a 'pro-poor' budget, sensex nose dives. Pranab assures the market that reforms are on, sensex recovers again. Poor monsoon predicted, sensex falls. Heavy downpoor in Mumbai, sensex rallies up. Rains continue for two more days, sensex in a pregnant pause. Mumbai flooded, sensex drops...

What sort of index is this of the economic health of the country? If daily trading is banned in BSE or at least, if their 'sentiments' are not taken into account, then probably I can consider this as an index. Even better, tell all the shareholders that anybody investing in a share cannot offload it for next 3 years, then it will really show what the shareholders feel and they will look at the industry and the particular company, estimate its growth prospects, rather than buying and selling based on the sneezes of the prime minister, moods of the finance minister, rumours of rains and droughts!
Till then, let us just call it non-sensex.


The downward slide probably is around the corner. Hope, I will have the wisdom to realise that phase and adjust to that, rather than try to assert myself on some poor friends and colleagues around me then. But, such worries can wait. Let me enjoy life when the going is good.
This is Babu, an adivasi youth belonging to Paniya community near Gudalur. This photo was taken in a protest demonstration held in Gudalur town last month, against the demolision of two adivasi houses in a remote village by a private tea estate staff. (You can read more about it in our official newsletter
"This injustice has happened to one of our fellow adivasi famiy. The same thing can happen to our village also tomorrow and we will need the support of everyone. So, it is my duty to participate in the procession." Just because I asked this question to him the previous evening, he was "extra active" in the procession, I thought. Whether they win or not, people like Babu keep the spirit of justice in our world.
Now, to the results. The right wing hindu religion-oriented party's roller-coaster ride seemed to be making head-way and everyone thought that they are going to form the next government. Or worse, all the predictions were for a hung-parliament, without any party having a clear majority. The scenario which everyone predicted in the last few days (the worst outcome in my view) was that a group of small parties led by Left will form the government, supported unwillingly by congress from outside. Fortunately, all these predictions were proved wrong and the UPA alliance won a majority on its own. I was quite happy with the outcome, though I am personally not a big fan of congress culture! Possibly, the best outcome that could have been.
I was quite amused with all these analysis, because the same people were predicting a hung parliament a couple of days ago. Didn't they know this psychology of the voter then? If so, they could have predicted the outcome properly? In fact, the entire media was complaining that money power is rampant; people are being offered sops; voters are going to vote whoever gives money; freebies are the deciding factor and what not!
The 'Miracle of Aggregation' - an idea formalised in a mathematical demonstration by the social theorist Marquis de Condorcet - seems to work in Indian democracy. He showed that a group trying to reach a decision by a majority vote (and in which each individual is making an independent judgement) is very likely to reach a correct decision even if each individual is only slightly more likely to reach the correct conclusion than he would simply by flipping a coin. Applied to electorate, Condorcet's logis suggests that the electorate as a whole may be much wiser than any individual voter.
Even in our villages, many of the old people are called கருப்பாயி or வெள்ளையன் or மூக்கன் etc. (meaning, girl with dark skin, boy with a fair skin, one with a big nose). But, these days we have very modern names without any meaning whatsoever. The only criterion is that it should be hard to pronounce!